This design use another kind of hollow cone. Such as the last one, it is being endlessly thin to reach the size of a micrometer.
Here, the thin head can be put near — or slightly past — the black-hole event horizon to probe its exact position (for theoretical purposes).
For this experiment, the probe would have a counter-mass with thrusters to position the thin probe where we want to.
With this design, it could be possible to observe light directly near or past the event horizon.
Imagine that there would be a more-tiny hole at the mere end of the thin pin probe of the hollow cone (red triangle), reflecting whatever it captures inside the back-front chamber (white semi-circle on the graphic).
Indeed, the thin observation head could probe near the black-hole event horizon point. But what if this thin probe pass past the black-hole event horizon point ? Theory says we could not escape anymore (meaning all the spaceship would fall into the black hole).
But what if the counter-mass is sufficient and the thruster blast is powerful enough to escape its attraction ? Could we escape the black-hole event horizon point if only the tiny thin observation probe moved further the event horizon (theoretical point) ? Maybe, if the counter-mass and the thrust power are enough (and, or if the black hole not supermassive).
So, if physics allows this experiment, would it be possible to probe the light inside the black-hole ? What would it looks like ?
In this experimental physics theoretical exercise, my guess, if this is possible, is that we could observe in the past as we want, simply by moving the deepness of the probe inside the black-hole and by adapting the reflective tools used in the back-front chamber (white semi-circle on the graphic).
So at the mere end of this thought experiment, we could see the dinosaurs extinction on Earth and rewind it endlessly as we want by using such a system orbiting and probing a black-hole. Or, counter any wild operation of history falsification, for such a system could be a warrant of True History (by observing the past details of our world)...
On a theosophical plane, such a physically built observatory — such a materially laced piece of art — could allow the Ones that built it to consult the Akashic Memory or the Akashic Archives (see more here).Â
We debated about black hole horizon and relative physics and what is the most suitable definition for it. We came to the agreement that the black hole horizon is the zone from which you can not come back from its attraction, light even. Then we argued about the design and size of the overall experience : if for a theoretical experience, we do produce a micron sized pinhead probe that we put at the nearest point possible of a small black hole horizon' event, and that we put a heaviest mass at the other side with a thrust (think laboratory-sized for example, with no LY in play) : what will happens ? Will it move the black hole horizon with the probe head ? What happens around the probe ? What happens at the mid and late part of the pinhead probe ?
Then we argued about feasibility, and BH orbiting constraints, I maintained that this experience might raise a fondamental physics enigma, and might move the back hole horizon with the probe.
I then point out that, indeed, the probe must be part of a bigger space observatory with thrust and mass games in play (to push backward at the same time you try the touch the horizon event with the probe). For theoretical matter, we then asked ourselves if this would not raise a paradoxical infinite energy issue (meaning that to do the event horizon probing you need an exponential amount of energy) — I stated that this may be eluded through a hollowed cone design (see the picture) — and playing with the observatory's dimension.
#Key:Invention #Key:Discovery #Key:Wow! #Key:Starred