🕓 — How to to keep democracy alive as a scientist


Formerly a thought experiment I kept for myself, I'd like to share what seems to be a funny note at first but is of relevancy in a world rapidly falling toward a brutal ending (cooked frogs).

The scientific community is known to frequently push for more action for either climate change reaction at a political scale or for research funding. Awaited reactions that are mostly ignored.

If one scientist working on coral reefs or soil degradation may not be at ease in the lab of an atomic clock scientist, it may be useful to have them as friends to build a unanimity based democracy (that may be parallel though).


In a world where atomic clocks rule everything, like GPS, stock market and high intensity trading or even your phone's synchronization with all this in an intricated network, a consensus of atomic clock scientists may decide to plug out one or several atomic clocks to send a strong message of disappointment to conventional governments. As the resulting consequences may be totally catastrophic, the potential reaction-lever could help open further negotiations as it truly is the equivalent of non-conventional dissuasion.