The experiment goes at such, at 05h08, the predifined timed question ask "Did you drink a coffee ?" — N°1 collapse a pair to "No", instantaneously N°2 get the corresponding pair collapsing to "Yes" but he knows that he have to reverse it to get the right answer, meaning "No".
That's it, N°1 and N°2 have exchanged information through a pair of collapsing particle.
âž Â Dimensional scale-up
Going from 2D ⊂ Time toward 3D ⊂ Time require more anticipations but the experiment could reproduced as follow :
You synchronize two running table with a set of questions, for example questions about well-being or a recipe. Each question rotate on the both table every two seconds (synchronized at first from an atomic clock, both on similar devices) ;
One table goes at one side of an intricated particle pair, and the other table at the other side of the pair. One table at each side.
A predefined set of possible answers is spatialized in the collapsing environment (the sphere).
To know who is speaking in the absence of other possible exchange means (because of distance), each time the full questions table ends, we change the speaker. Meaning, at end of the first table run (for the both synchronized devices) we move from speaker N°1 to speaker N°2 — and then at the next full run to N°2 to N°1 ;
Collapse.
Thanks to initially synchronized running questions tables and alternative speaker turns, both of them can know who spoke and which question they are speaking about and what is the answer, simply by reversing the meaning of the collapsing pair in the spatialized segmented environment — when a collapse occur.
Indeed, the results from these experiments are to be scaled up again for long distances — to break from theoretical to practical instantaneous QCOM (spaceships at the best).
Even if the intricaction furbish a reading sense by itself, to make sense of the collapsing environnement exchange reading grid (see Yes, No on the graph) in a 3D ⊂ Time environment, the system could be aligned on a star like the Sun — to juxtapose the grid (Yes, No, etc.) above. This might be helpful further in time.
Through a fast rotating question table — let's say you have around 3 000 predefined questions in a minute, thanks to precise second decimation (one question per hundredth of second or so) — that are synchronized, you'd have a speaker turn of one minute each side. For a person to answer a question, a vocal recognition system may be used to then pick up the right second hundredth tick to collapse the pair when his turn goes on . Then on the other side, the reverse lecture environment would help transmit the answer to the interlocutor.
We do not know if we communicate exactly right at the same time but the strict contact initialization is (collapse), as you can see technically on the scheme below.
