✨ — Planification : a need for stability
From 2018
Cover by @lulu_platypus 2016
To work on the global climatic issue at a global scale, we firstly need strengthened bonds hence a strengthened global stability. Stability for further adaptive and coordinated solutions implementation, but also to prevent any global catastrophe that could wreck the whole boat before we could even move in the good direction (like wars). As I exposed it in the note "Another way to Agree" auto-organisation around a common Schelling point may work better than a globalized and centralized decision-taking organization*.
The common Schelling point we have here is clearly that we must act for climate, but there's a little trick before. Like for a growing plant, we must place tutors.
To move toward this vision, I slightly pressured the spatial ecosystem through space debris securization in 2020 (by exposing the risk of a possible debris militarization against other moving targets, see my D1 & D1+ in 20f6bd Archives). This was done, among other things, to provoke a reaction to ensure more space stability, like :
More space awareness, and :
More coordinated or auto-organized coordination against space debris, which is a way to articulate individuals and states at a global level without centralisation.
Why ?
More space awareness and coordination give us more chance and probability to exclude the following scenarios :
Space warfare ;
Nuclear detonation in space ;
Debris wrecks out or Kessler Syndrome (you can hear more about Kessler Syndrome folding exponential effects here).
What for ?
This work gives us more time to tackle climate change issues, because it can prevent scenarios of orbital catastrophe from happening, as this dangerous outcome would render any current and further work useless as it would brings :
Radio-communication shutdown
Internet shutdown (important nodes run in space, as GPS)
Severe global instability
By acting on these parameters, I first worked as described on spatial environment stability before working on climate issues (like you can see in this entire section) — all because an orbital catastrophe (i.e. Kessler Syndrome) would destroy all our current efforts (no communications, nor GPS nor internet, etc.). This enhanced stability and multipartite awareness paves a more fertile ground to implement solutions — for example — the one listed in this entire section (Ecology)
Then, to alleviate other possible wreck out scenarios — specifically nuclear war — I shared the Magnetosphere hypothesis in August 2023. It expose a clear correlation if not a causation between anthropological nuclear activities (bomb detonations in particular) and the acceleration and direction-vector of Earth's magnetic drift. This too, should make corresponding authorities react and give us more space to address climate issues — and I hope, avoid nuclear escalade going out of hand, so we can at least give it a try to fight climate change.
* In Game Theory, Schelling points or focal points applied to human relationship are the points of equilibrium a multipartite system tends to find if the different actors are animated by the same Will.
Also, are sunflower anarchic ?