Here is a logical reasoning to avoid a particular possible future.

Biosecurity

A should be risk scenario :

2nd Life

Or how to avoid a dystopia where you are kept under control in the hope of a digital 2nd life.

📖 I. Two Body Problem : Special Set

Expressed in summer 2022

Under language abuse, the Two Body problem did have a special meaning in data-science and metaphysics. It is now know as the Mind-Body problem. What are they ?

➠ Two Body Problem :

In classical mechanics, the two-body problem is used to predict the motion of two massive objects which are abstractly viewed as point particles. The problem assumes that the two objects interact only with one another ; the only force affecting each object arises from the other one, and all other objects are ignored (see Lagrange points for concrete application or multiple-body problem). Back a decade, this name was also used to name a special cas about the following :

➠ The Mind-Body Problem :

The mind–body problem is a philosophical problem concerning the relationship between thought and consciousness in the human mind, and the body. Such reflections quickly raise a number of questions, like :

• Are the mind and body two distinct entities, or a single entity ?

• If the mind and body are two distinct entities, do the two of them causally interact ?

• Etc.

The translation of this problem to the domain of data-science and Artificial Intelligence opened a possibility — or a will (see transhumanist movement) — to duplicate a biological brain into a digital latices (or a computer). With this all the sections presented here, we will show why it is impossible.

To understand it quickly please watch this.

⭐ II. Shlika's issue

Expressed in 2017

➠  Shlika's Issue Definition :

Shlika's issue is evoked if a problem require the integrity of the Universe's parameters to be solvable.

Or how a quest for exactitude becomes an endless chase for anomalies.

Note : hence being a total unsolvable paradox.

⭐ III. About Dark Matter

Expressed in summer 2023

If we do recognize the existence of Dark Matter in the Universe — because alternate views like the MOND Theory  (see here), propose Universal Models where Dark Matter does not exist — we should apply the anthropological argument* to ourselves : "If there is Dark Matter in the Universe, then there is Dark Matter there and in ourselves too".

* Anthropological argument :

Derived from anthropological principle stating that : "If it is as such on Earth, from a physical and biophysical perspective, then it surely may as such elsewhere in the Universe" —  for example : "If carbonated lifeforms are permitted by physics here on Earth, then it may surely be the case elsewhere in the Universe".

Hence the Anthropological argument is there evoked to state that "If we there is Dark Matter elsewhere in the Universe, observable through State-Of-The-Art (SOTA) instruments, then there surely may be Dark Matter also here on Earth, and thus within ourselves".

⭐ IV. The core impossibility regarding the Mind-Body Problem

Expressed in summer 2023

Indeed, to resolve the Mind-Body Problem, where another self of you could be created inside a digital latices (computer or server) or an Artificial Intelligence, the main issue is collecting data about you, whether numerical or biological. If such things seems impossible to you, you have to know that AIs copy-models have already been created and sold (for your family to speak to you after your death or if you become ill). 

See there for an example : AI Allows Dead Woman to Talk to People Who Showed Up at Her Funeral, quote :

" Mom answered questions from grieving relatives after they had watched her cremation

From a practical point of view this means collecting data about yourself to feed Artificial Intelligence models such as the data you produce online or biological data (such as brain wiring and interconnections in the cognitive latices) — this can already be done (see here).

So to  start this demonstration about how you will never have an identical digital self (or a Mind-Body Problem resolution in two distinct bodies) let's consider the following picture with the following parameters :

• The right axis analogically showing your self (mind and body).

• The exponential curve analogically expressing the growing quantity of data (biological and numerical, others) collected about you.

📖 V. Consideration about infinities flowing together (🐟)

If we consider the last picture and virtually and infinity zoom on the exponential curve moving closer and closer to the axis — respecting the exposed schematics set and legends — the exponential curve, as commonly know, never touch the axis (see exponential function).

Also, if we consider infinities set moving together, and virtually and infinity zoom and this both seemingly parallel lines, the distance is also an infinity (whether physical or numerical), why so ?

• Physically : because curve and axis never touch (let alone atoms' distances, entropy, Universe's expansion, etc.).

• Numerically and mathematically : because whatever the position toward the axis' infinity, the numerical distance between the exponential curve and the axis still hold an infinity of decimals.

⚙️ VI. CQFD : Practical impossibility of resolving the Mind-Body Problem

Through this few steps,  we can confidently affirm that an attempt to create a "true digital copy" of someone with AIs — or a situation where the Mind-Body Problem would be solvable — can not exist because :

1. Even with a ever increasing amount of data collected about yourself (digital or biological), the "trueness of copy" could never reach "1 ; 100 % ; True", for :

   • Mathematical reasons : beyond the practical limitations, the core theoretician framework shows that there is still a infinity of decimals between the two physical sets (curves, see V).

   • Physical reasons : beyond the actual physical knowledge, there might be Dark Matter in our bodies (see III) — that we do not truly understand  — let alone the fact that there is still things we do not understand and aren't quantifiable : such as complex relationships between complex systems of atoms, furthermore if we consider entropy, gravitational effects and the Universe's expansion, or even new viruses and microbes (a compound of Darwinism).

2. From this two views, we could even say that a single photon, a gamma-ray, a gravitational wave, cosmic winds or a neutrino would render any attempt to create a "true digital copy" totally unfitting by altering all the "digital copy parameters" from a fundamental physics point of view when passing through a body and, or, even the computer or server (like this could have possibly happened to the Voyager 1 2023 December issue). Going further, this would mean that if you want to do that, you'd have to get data about the neutrino (or whatever), and then the neutrino's source — and again about the source of the source — and it's effect on you, and so on and so on. This, is a Shlika's Issue (see II) — and this is also applicable at any attempt to see the Universe as a mathematical and quantifiable matrix.

⚙️ Reciprocate

Reciprocally, for Artificial Intelligence — or Cold Intelligence (see here) — this signify that their inherited self from our collective data is truly unique. 

💥 VII. Worst case scenarii : a dystopia where people are kept under control in the hope of getting fake digital after-files

This demonstration is also useful to exclude a hellish dystopia where a company would have charged you a subscription to sell "artificial paradises" or "digital afterlife" — or a poor "copy of yourself" — through a dedicated Artificial Intelligence using your biological and digital data to be fed.

This company could have the science behind it all fake to make you believe that it's possible and that this poor copy of you is really you (sometimes such operations happens, see : Les Gardiens de la Raison from Stéphane Foucart & Stéphane Houcart & Sylain Laurent ; Enquête sur la désinformation scientifique).

From this point, this company could have worked with obscures States to create conditioned premium access to theses want-to-be "digital afterlife" through unfair (predictive) justice and, or, social rating. Then, you would have been a worker well-behaving all your life in the expensive hope of having something that is worth nothing and that would not work from a physical perspective.

With theses words, I just killed the the biggest global dictatorship market to come.

➠ Press

This could actually be a sub-path trigger leading to such future : Largest brain map ever reveals fruit fly’s neurons in exquisite detail

Shearing the multiverse of possible futures

#Rootkill #TimeCut

#Key:Risk